Interdisciplinary Cultural and Humanities Review

ISSN 2786-7110 | e-ISSN 2786-7129 | UDC 7
Submit an article
Open Access

Sacred art and iconography in religious traditions

Jun-Ki Chung

Abstract

This study was conducted to provide a comprehensive examination of sacred art and iconography, as well as their significance in shaping religious identity and conveying spiritual ideas across diverse cultural contexts. Key stages in the development of sacred art were explored, revealing its evolution and impact on religious and cultural traditions. Iconography was examined as a distinct form of religious expression, highlighting its role in constructing religious images and symbols used to communicate profound spiritual meanings. The research also addressed key concepts of symbolism, which play a central role in the transmission of religious messages through visual imagery. Symbols such as colours, forms, and animal motifs were analysed to better understand their function in the formation of religious ideas and concepts. It was found that metaphors and allegories present in sacred art play an important role in creating multilayered meanings, contributing to a deeper understanding of spiritual and moral truths. The study also encompassed contemporary approaches to the preservation of sacred art, including the role of museums and fonds in safeguarding religious heritage. The use of digital technologies for creating high-quality reproductions of iconographic objects was examined, highlighting how such methods contribute to the preservation of these artworks for future generations and enhance their accessibility to wider audiences. The findings demonstrated that sacred art serves as a vital instrument in shaping religious identity, offering believers the opportunity for profound spiritual experiences through rituals and ceremonies. Iconography, with its intricate symbolism, emerged as a key medium for conveying religious messages, contributing to a deeper understanding of spiritual and moral truths. Overall, the study emphasised the importance of an integrated approach to the preservation, interpretation, and transmission of sacred art, which is essential for maintaining religious and cultural heritage for future generations

Keywords: symbolism; religious image; restoration; metaphorical approach; cultural heritage

How to Cite

Chung, J.-K. (2025). Sacred art and iconography in religious traditions. Interdisciplinary Cultural and Humanities Review, 4(1), 35-45. https://doi.org/10.59214/cultural/1.2025.35

References

  1. Albia, B.B., Blanza, B.M., & Chanco, A.J.S. (2023). From icons to AI: Evolution of imagery in religious communication. Religion and Social Communication, 21(2), 270-294. doi: 10.62461/BMA112923.
  2. Arca, S. (2019). Spirituality and contemporary art. (Master’s thesis, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, Great Britain).
  3. Archbishop, I. (2017). The sacredness of the icon and its importance in our religious-moral life. Altarul Reîntregirii, 22(1), 7-21.
  4. Baroncini, S., Daquino, M., & Tomasi, F. (2021). Modelling art interpretation and meaning. A data model for describing iconology and iconography. ARXIV. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2106.12967.
  5. Benedetti, A.L. (2021). Civil Religion Iconography: A New Theoretical Perspective Regarding Public Art. (Master’s thesis, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden).
  6. Boldrick, S. (2020). Iconoclasm and the museum. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780429428524.
  7. Bruce-Mitford, M. (2019). Signs & Symbols: An illustrated guide to their origins and meanings. London: Dorling Kindersley Ltd. a
  8. BuddhaNet. (n.d.). Symbolism of the mandala. Retrieved from https://www.buddhanet.net/mandalas.htm.
  9. Daskas, B. (2020). Picture and text: on the “iconography” of sacred spaces in middle-Byzantine ekphraseis. Byzantinische Zeitschrift, 113(1), 35-68. doi: 10.1515/bz-2020-0003.
  10. Dominte, G., Vraciu, M., & Onica, S. (2019). On the educational, aesthetic and ethic benefits of sacred art. LUMEN Proceedings, 7(1), 250-262. doi: 10.18662/lumproc.117.
  11. Dzalto, D. (2019). The aesthetic face of the sacred. Religion, 10(5), article number 302. doi: 10.3390/rel10050302.
  12. Encyclopedia Britannica. Britannica. (2024). “Cross”. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/topic/crossreligious-symbol.
  13. Fletcher, A. (2021). Allegory: The theory of a symbolic mode. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  14. Fozi, S. (2019). Iconography. In R. Conrad (Ed.), A companion to medieval art: Romanesque and gothic in Northern Europe (2nd ed.) (pp. 245-265). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. doi: 10.1002/9781119077756.ch10.
  15. Gahtan, M.W. (2022). Exhibitions and displays of religious art. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Religion. doi: 10.1093/ acrefore/9780199340378.013.911.
  16. Grabar, A. (2023). Christian iconography: A study of its origins. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  17. Images of Venice. (n.d.). The Lion of St Mark. Retrieved from https://imagesofvenice.com/the-lion-of-st-mark/.
  18. Jagielska-Burduk, A., Pszczyński, M., & Stec, P. (2021). Cultural heritage education in UNESCO Cultural Conventions. Sustainability, 13(6), article number 3548. doi: 10.3390/su13063548.
  19. Knights Templar. (n.d.). Explore the beauty of gothic stained glass art today. Retrieved from https://knightstemplar.co/ explore-the-beauty-of-gothic-stained-glass-art-today/#google_vignette.
  20. Kosloski, P. (2017). 5 Colors and their symbolism in sacred art. Retrieved from https://aleteia.org/2017/09/25/5colors-and-their-symbolism-in-art.
  21. Kuczok, M. (2020). The interplay of metaphor and metonymy in Christian symbols. Metaphor and Symbol, 35(4), 236249. doi: 10.1080/10926488.2020.1809313.
  22. Larson, P. (2020). Iconography. In D.A. Leeming (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychology and religion (pp. 1135-1137). Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-24348-7_318.
  23. Mairesse, F. (2019). The sacred in the prism of museology. Museology and the Sacred, 47(1-2), 15-22. doi: 10.4000/ iss.1286.
  24. Marra, A., Salvatore, I., Greco, A., & Fabbrocino, G. (2021). Combining integrated informative system and historical digital twin for maintenance and preservation of artistic assets. Sensors, 21(17), article number 5956. doi: 10.3390/ s21175956.
  25. Mathews, T.F. (2022). The clash of gods: A reinterpretation of early Christian art ‒ Revised and expanded edition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  26. Miron, V. (2021). The importance of church iconography. RAIS Journal for Social Sciences, 5(2), 70-76.
  27. Peleggi, M. (2021). A theory of devotional conservation: A preliminary proposal. San Francisco: Academia Letters. doi: 10.20935/al189.
  28. Saari, S. (2020). Lions in images and narratives. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland).
  29. Stokstad, M. (2021). Medieval art (2nd Ed.). London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780429037184.
  30. Strickland, D.H. (2016). Animal iconography. In C. Hourihane (Ed.), The Routledge companion to medieval iconography. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781315298375.
  31. The University of Memphis. (n.d.). About the reliefs and inscriptions. Retrieved from https://www.memphis.edu/ hypostyle/reliefs_inscriptions/westwallnorthhalf.php.
  32. Tyrwhitt, J. (2023). Christian art and symbolism. Norderstedt: BoD.
  33. Ujvari, E. (2020). Religious symbols from the point of view of visual semiotics. The International Journal of Religion and Spirituality in Society, 10(3), 17-26. doi: 10.18848/2154-8633/CGP/v10i03/17-26.
  34. VintageLeGrecque (2024). Byzantine icon, orthodox icon, Holly Virgin Mary with baby Jesus, Greek icon, vintage original religious painting. Retrieved from https://www.vintagelegrecque.com/listing/505026408/byzantine-icon-orthodoxicon-holly.
  35. Winfield, P.D. (2019). The philosophy of the mandala. In G. Kopf (Ed.), The Dao companion to Japanese Buddhist philosophy. Dao Companions to Chinese Philosophy (pp. 235-253). Dordrecht: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-90-4812924-9_8.
  36. X. (2013). Mosaic calligraphy in the Great Mosque of #Cordoba, Spain. Retrieved from https://x.com/LostIslamicHist/ status/354670677732769792.
  37. Zhang, H., & Zhenyu Qian, C. (2024). The interplay of religion and the visual arts: A bibliometric network analysis (1991-2023). Religions, 15(4), article number 481. doi: 10.3390/rel15040481.

Search the Journal