Ukrainian baroque iconostasis and liturgical structuring of the monastery space
Abstract
Baroque iconostases of Ukraine with thematic iconographies have repeatedly come to the attention of researchers. This refers to iconostases that did not contain the composition Deesis and other images necessary for the year-round cycle of divine services. Instead of the traditional complex of icons, such iconostases contained images that fully covered the theme of the consecration of the altar. The preserved monuments are described in sufficient detail, but the motives and meanings of implementing such programmes have not yet been convincingly explained. The study offers a new look at the reasons for the appearance and symbolic meaning of thematic iconographic programmes of Ukrainian iconostases of the Baroque era. The meaning of introducing edited iconographic programmes is reconstructed using the hierotopic method. Its application identified that the development of thematic iconographies was based on a spatial iconographic concept in which the programmes of several iconostases interacted. The study showed that thematic iconographies were common in the iconostases of side chapels, while the main iconostasis contained all the necessary complex of images, including the Deesis composition. It is established that the introduction of thematic iconography for the main iconostasis was possible only for the monastery church, which in this case was understood as a chapel relative to the central iconostasis of the cathedral church of the monastery. In this carefully designed image system, the icon complexes of the iconostases of side altars and other monastic churches interacted with the iconographic programme of the iconostasis of the main altar in real space. The implementation of such a project expanded the liturgical space of the main church, covering the monastery complex. Therewith, symbolic meanings associated with the image of the temple in the Christian tradition were transferred to the monastery. The proposed reconstruction explains the lack of practice of creating thematic iconographies for the iconostases of the main altars in parish churches
How to Cite
References
[1] Acts of the Moscow Council of 1666. (1995). On various church corrections. Retrieved from https://www.domarchive.ru/books/raskol/raskol_3/2332.
[2] Dorofienko, I., Miliaieva, L., & Rutkovska, O. (2016). Sorochyn iconostasis – an outstanding work of fine art of the 1730s. Kyiv: Rodovid.
[3] Ivanchenko, Yu.O. (2006). Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra – a monument of history and culture of Ukraine. Kyiv: NKPIKZ.
[4] Konstantynowicz, J.B. (1939). Ikonostasis. Studien und Forschungen. Erster Band. Lviv (Lemberg): Buchhandlung der Ševčenko Geselschaft der Wissenschaften.
[5] Lebedintsev, P.G. (1882). Description of the Kiev-Sofia Cathedral. Kyiv: E.T. Kerer.
[6] Lidov, A. (2014). The temple veil as a spatial icon revealing an image-paradigm of medieval iconography and hierotopy. Ikon, 7, 97-108. doi: 10.1484/J.IKON.5.102967.
[7] Litvinenko, J. (2012). Lost iconostasis of the Lavra churches. Sights of Ukraine, 6, 58-75.
[8] Litvinenko, Y. (2007). Artistic embodiment of the program “All Saints” in the iconostasis of the All Saints Church of the Kiev-Pechersk Lavra. Kiev: Feniks.
[9] Murkos, G.A. (1897). The journey of Patriarch Macarius of Antioch to Russia in the middle of the 17th century, described by his son, Archdeacon Pavel of Aleppo. Retrieved from https://www.prlib.ru/item/441216.
[10] Nersesyan, L. (2000). Sophia Wisdom of God. Exhibition of Russian icon painting of the 13th-19th centuries from the collections of Russian museums. Moscow: Radunitsa.
[11] Nikitenko, N. (2007). The main iconostasis of Sophia of Kyiv as a historical and cultural phenomenon. Sights of Ukraine, 1, 22-46.
[12] Nikitenko, N.M. (2000). Hetman Mazepa is the patron saint of Sophia of Kyiv. Scientific Notes of NaUKMA, 18, 40-44.
[13] Olyanina, S. (2012). Iconostasis of the Church of the Annunciation of St. Michael’s Cathedral of the Vydubychi Monastery. Kyiv: NKPIKZ.
[14] Oparina, T.A. (2003). The number 1666 in Russian literature of the middle – third quarter of the 17th century. Retrieved from http://starajavera.narod.ru/oparina1666.html.
[15] Pavlutsky, G. (1911). Stone church architecture in Ukraine. History of Russian art. Moscow: I. Knebel.
[16] Ryzhova, O.O. (2020). Iconography in the Artistic Culture of Kyiv of the Late XVII-XVIII Centuries. Kyiv: VPC “Kyiv University”.
[17] Shcherbyna, V.I. (1926). The main buildings of the Pechersk Lavra. New Studies on the History of Kyiv. Kyiv: UAS.
[18] Sitkareva, O.V. (2000). Assumption сathedral of the Kiev-Pechersk lavra: To the history of architectural and archaeological research and reconstruction project. Kyiv: Holy Dormition Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra.
[19] Sitkareva, O.V. (2006). Formation of the architectural ensemble of the Kiev-Pechersk Lavra of the XVII-XX centuries. Kyiv: Musical Ukraine.
[20] Sofonovich, Th. (2002). Presentation of the Holy Church. Kyiv: KM Academy.
[21] The “Negatives” fund of the National Sanctuary Complex “Sophia of Kyiv”. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://st-sophia.org.ua/uk/golovna/.
[22] Ulyanovsk, V. (2009). Vydubitsky monastery of the miracle of the Archangel Michael. History in faces, monuments of architecture and church art. Kyiv: Publishing House “Museum of the Sheremetievs”.
[23] Zakharchenko, M.M. (1888). Kyiv now and before. Kyiv: S.V. Kulzhenko.